The COVID19 pandemic: Public Health and Epidemiology
NOTE: This is a prepublication draft manuscript. The final published copy may differ. Please consult the final published copy in the April of May APJPH if you would like to cite or quote.
Colin Binns1, Wah Yun Low2, Mi Kyung Lee3
1School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
2Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
In this issue of the journal we publish a review of COVID19 infection by two eminent virologists, MacKenzie and Smith (see in this issue). It’s too early in the history of the COVID19 outbreak to write the full history, but their paper provides a good outline of the emerging pandemic. The disease is causing widespread social disruption in many countries and it has just been announced that the 2020 Asia Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health (APACPH) Conference has been postponed indefinitely. The media are full of daily totals of new cases, hospital and intensive care admissions and deaths. The actual numbers are dependent on the testing regimes in use at different locations. In the first two months of 2020 there were hundreds of papers and commentaries published on Corona viruses, including a major clinical review in the Lancet, that has already had almost 500 citations1. Corona viruses are a large family of viruses that can cause human diseases, but usually mild in nature, such as a common cold. There have been two previous severe outbreaks of novel corona viruses: SARS in 2003 and MERS-CoV in 2012 which together caused more than 10000 cases. The case fatality rates were 10% for SARS-CoV and 37% for MERS-CoV1. In this commentary we will discuss additional public health issues that will assist in teaching at our public health institutions.
Since the first cases of COVID19 the reported numbers have increased rapidly, with more than 220000 cases and 9000 deaths to mid-March 2020 and cases are now being reported from all of the more populous countries2. The symptoms of COVID19 infection are non-specific and include elevated temperature and cough. This then progresses to shortness of breath3. A clinical report of the first patients from Wuhan (n=41) with COVID19 infection gave the following details of clinical symptoms: fever 98%, cough 76%, myalgia or fatigue 44%, sputum 28% and dyspnoea 55%. The average time from the first onset of symptoms to the development of dyspnoea was 8 days. In the first report from outside of Wuhan (from Zhejiang Province, n=62) the symptoms were: fever 77% cough 81%, sputum 56%, headache 34%, myalgia or fatigue 52%. The disease is more likely to occur in people who have a chronic illness, are immunocompromised or are older. Those who contracted the virus and were over 60 years of age, and particularly over 80 years, were more likely to require admission to ICU and have an increased case fatality rate4. (See Table1 in Mackenzie). In Wuhan there were 1023 deaths from the 44672 confirmed cases, an overall CFR of 2.3%.
The initial clinical symptoms of COVID19 are the symptoms of a common cold and influenza. Every adult gets 2-3 colds per year, and more frequently in children5. With a world population of around 7.8 billion this suggests there are 20 billion cases every year. Screening all of these cases for possible COVID19 would obviously be impossible and so testing for the virus is confined to those with other risk factors, including contact with confirmed cases and travel from outbreak epicentres.
COVID19 is the latest in a continuing series of infectious disease epidemics in the history of the human race. As population numbers and population density increases, the likelihood of epidemics increases. Probably the greatest epidemic of all time was the influenza epidemic of 1918 which caused an estimated 50 million deaths worldwide and had a case fatality rate of more than 2.5% and which could have been as high as 10%6. This was in the pre-antibiotic days and before an influenza vaccine and anti-viral therapy had been developed. Infectious diseases remain a major challenge for public health.
To assist in defining, containing, preventing and ultimately in successfully treating those who become ill in an epidemic it is important to understand the basic epidemiology of the outbreak. Experts from many institutions have collaborated together in an effort to categorise the COVID19 outbreak. Most infectious diseases have a spectrum of severity from clinically undetected disease through to death7. Figure1 is modified from the paper prepared by Imperial College. It is likely that only the cases with severe symptoms or other risk factors (e.g. contact with a known case) are being identified at present, but it varies between countries.
Figure 1 Spectrum of COVID19 disease.
For some diseases the base of the triangle in Figure 1 would be much wider and this may be the situation with COVID19. The base of subclinical or cases with minimal symptoms may be much greater than those with disease severe enough for hospital admission. The history of public health contains a number of examples of infectious diseases that were initially thought to have had a very high Case Fatality Rate (CFR) only for it to be revised downward later. Lassa Fever was initially described as a very severe disease, with a case fatality rate close to 100%. However, as more widespread epidemiological studies were undertaken in West Africa, it was found that 50% or more of the population of Sierra Leone and Guinea were sero-positive to the disease without showing any symptoms8. Under these circumstances the case fatality rate for Lassa virus is now thought to be low (<1%), but the CFR for severe disease remains very high.
Definitions (Some terms in the Epidemiology):
When assessing the likely impact of an infectious disease there are two parameters that are considered: the likelihood of transmission of the disease (its capacity to spread), and the severity of the disease and its capacity to kill (or disable) those infected. These are assessed using the reproduction rate and the case fatality rate.
Reproduction rate (R0). The base reproduction number (R0) for transmission, indicates the number of secondary infections due to an initial case. (R0 = virgin state, a population with no previous exposure to this infection9). In populations that have previously been exposed to the infection, and have some immunity, the reproduction rate may be lower.
Case fatality rate (CFR) is defined as the as the proportion of reported cases of a specified disease which are fatal within a specified time10. The CFR depends on the definition of disease, the accuracy of diagnosis (case detection) and the availability of treatment.
Transmissibility and severity are the two most critical factors that determine the public health impact of an epidemic11. A disease that has a high transmission rate and is very severe is the greatest public health risk. COVID19 has a high transmission rate and the CFR appears to be greater than for influenza epidemics and it is therefore potentially a major public health threat.
Infectivity is the tendency to spread the infection from host to host. The period of infectivity for some diseases commences before symptoms appear, making it far more difficult to control spread.
The spectrum of clinical disease (See Fig 1) makes it difficult to define a case and even more difficult to calculate a case fatality rate, as the denominator is not readily defined. In February the CFR for COVID19 infection was estimated by WHO to be 2%, much lower than for MERS and SARS, but estimates of the CFR have changed over time as the criteria for counting the number of cases in the denominator has changed to include very mild or even asymptomatic infections12. Changes in the denominator decrease the case fatality rate and increase the reproducibility rate. In some situations the reproducibility rate changes and the quarantine of passengers on a cruise ship in Yokohama had a R0 four times greater (as high as 14) compared to the initial R0 in Wuhan9.
The use of diagnostic tests has traditionally been reported using measures of sensitivity (proportion of true positives that are correctly identified by the test) and specificity (proportion of true negatives that are correctly identified by the test)13. At the present time COVID19 disease is diagnosed by detecting the virus in throat and nasal swabs in patients who have symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection who have been in a region with disease transmission. No other screening tests are yet available and in the absence of “gold standard” for diagnosis, these parameters are not yet being calculated.
Incubation period is the time between exposure to an infectious agent and the appearance of clinical symptoms (or physiological evidence of disease). It is not known if transmission of the virus occurs during this period and before the presence of clinical symptoms. The WHO estimates of the incubation period for COVID-19 range from 1-14 days, most commonly around five days. Modelling of the role of contact tracing and case isolation suggest that these are effective in the control of epidemics such as COVID1914. In Australia the home isolation (quarantine) of contacts or suspected cases is recommended for 14 days15. If transmission is occurring before symptoms appear it makes it more difficult to control an infectious disease.
The virus is contained in droplets from coughing and nasal secretions. It can survive up to 24 hours on surfaces under favourable conditions. Most transmission will occur through spread by hands and not from the direct inhalation of droplets. The WHO recommends the following to prevent transmission of the virus:
- Regularly and thoroughly clean your hands with an alcohol-based hand rub or wash them with soap and water.
- Maintain at least 1 metre distance between yourself and others, and in particular from anyone who is coughing or sneezing.
- Avoid touching eyes, nose and mouth.
- Make sure you, and the people around you, follow good respiratory hygiene. This means covering your mouth and nose with your bent elbow or tissue when you cough or sneeze. Then dispose of the used tissue immediately.
- Stay at home if you feel unwell. If you have a fever, cough and difficulty breathing, seek medical attention and call in advance. Follow the directions of your local health authority.16
Vaccine Development
Despite much research and success in some animal models, including primates, there is still no vaccine for SARS. The first clinical cases of SARS were noted in Nov 2002, but it was not until 5 months later that a causative agent was isolated17. Transmission and dispersion around the world occurred by respiratory aerosols and contact via hands, and in several cases this was from touching door handles. There were 8098 reported cases of SARS and 774 deaths from many different countries18. While there is no doubt the virus has the potential to re-emerge at present it is not a clinical issue at present. SARS has a lower transmissibility than COVID19.
The development, testing and mass production of vaccines is always time consuming before they can be deployed on a population-wide scale. The development, testing and distribution of a vaccine will take years. Despite the interest in SARS there is still no vaccine and in other cases important diseases have defied vaccine development, notably malaria and dengue.
Seasonality
Will COVID19 decline in the northern summer following the pattern of influenza? This may be because people are more likely to have closer contact with others because it is colder. It could also relate to relative humidity levels which are lower in winter. In western countries when it is a cooler in winter respiratory infections increase (e.g. influenza). However this seasonality does not apply to influenza in India19. A study of a new strain of influenza in Vietnam shows that in the early years of this variant there was significant transmission though out the first year and the usual seasonal transmission pattern evolved a few years later20. In Australia, it is summer and hot and the COVID19 is spreading here. This suggests that COVID 19 transmission may not be related to climatic conditions and may not be seasonal in its early year(s) as the population is being exposed for the first time.
Smallpox as an example of the role of epidemiology in disease control
The history of smallpox elimination provides an example of the role of epidemiology in defeating an infectious disease. The practice of variolation to prevent smallpox had been in existence for several centuries, particularly in the Middle East, before Edward Jenner popularized the process and published his paper on the topic21. Vaccination against smallpox developed for almost two centuries before the disease was certified as being eliminated in 198022. What was needed was a thorough understanding of the epidemiology of the disease. By studying seasonal variation and transmission within an infection cluster it was shown that with vaccination of perhaps 5% of the population, the immediate case contacts, was just as effective as vaccinating 100% of the population23. Understanding the epidemiology of outbreaks proved to be the effective way of eliminating the disease24. Recording all of the details of the COVID19 outbreak is basic to understanding its epidemiology and the natural history of the disease and could provide the key to defeating the disease outbreak.
Health Ethics
There are several ethical issues that have already been raised in this outbreak. The Importance of preserving the physical and mental health and availability of health workers in an epidemic situation is very important. The quality of health care depends almost entirely on them having a professional service ethic that motivates them to provide the highest quality care to all with the resources available to them 25. This often leads them to put their own health and safety at risk, especially in infectious disease outbreaks. After the SARS outbreak of 2003 which caused illness and deaths among health workers, the ethics of exposing staff to the disease was still being debated in 201926. The history of public health is full of the writings of the heroism of health-workers providing care to those in need, despite danger to themselves27. However, experience has shown that risks associated with outbreaks of life–threatening infections only receive attention after health workers have suffered serious adverse consequences. Institutions need to prepare for outbreaks and provide the best available protective equipment to their workers and volunteers.
A further ethical issue is the development of vaccines. If this proves possible it will take several years to develop, test and submit for approval. Then issues of distribution and cost will need to be finalised. Professor Jeffrey Sachs, health economist, public health advocate and former advisor to the Secretary General of the UN for the development of the Sustainable Development Goals has written an editorial on the development of a vaccine for COVID1928. Sachs states that in earlier public health emergencies the development of preventive measures governments, non-profit foundations and international organisations took the lead and made the vaccine or knowledge available freely. Sachs discusses the example of Jonas Salk who did not patent the polio vaccine, making it affordable to programs all over the world. However in the case of COVID 19 the present US administration is stating that commercial companies will develop the vaccine and its availability will depend on the market. Will the profits of multinational companies will come before the survival of the poor in lower income countries28?
Public Health Actions
Reducing the peak of new cases by slowing down the spread of new cases is very useful as it
- Reduces the load on diagnostic and treatment services
- Reduces the number of health workers who contract the disease and who can continue working
- If the epidemic curve can be smoothed, it will result in a lower overall disease burden.
There are examples from the historical control of epidemics using public health measures that may be applied to COVID19. An analysis of records from 17 cities in the USA during the 1918 shows that cities which implemented public health measures (isolation, banning meetings etc.) were successful in reducing epidemic peaks and overall mortality29. This was in a naiive population, not previously exposed to this virus. Hatchett documented the substantial differences between St Louis (which banned mass gatherings) and the higher death rates in Philadelphia which allowed the massed celebratory marches following world war I to proceed29.
Useful public health interventions to reduce the peak of new cases include:
- Personal hygiene – no handshaking, no direct physical contact with others, keeping one metre distance from others. No coughing in public. Do not touch your face, wash hands frequently with soap and water. Eat cooked food that is still hot. These measures require clean water supplies (also important for nutrition and food safety)
- Reducing person to person contact by banning public gatherings, closing schools, home quarantining, controlling public transport etc. has been effective, but disruptive, in some communities
- Isolation of cases and quarantine (usually self-quarantine) of contacts.
There is more information on the WHO and CDC websites2,3.
In their modelling Hellewell et al. suggest that isolation of cases and tracing of contacts may be successful in controlling an outbreak within 3 months14. In the current global situation, it appears that some countries have been able to slow the epidemic while others have been overwhelmed by peaks of cases.
Universities are presented with major challenges to manage the COVID19 epidemic. They are gathering places for thousands of young adults. The academics who teach them are usually older and are more vulnerable to complications. Obviously large gatherings should be avoided and wider use be made of online teaching and tutorials. On campus the usual precautions of avoiding contact, keeping distance and frequent hand washing should apply. Many universities and schools have closed temporarily. Within the memory of one of us (CWB) these personal precautions were applied with success to polio, influenza and hepatitis. We hope that these precautions will lead to a containment of the epidemic allowing time to continue development and clinical trials of a vaccine.
Conclusion
The emergence of COVID19 is a serious global public health problem. The future direction of the epidemic is unknown. The size of the outbreak will depend on reducing transmission which at the present time means using traditional public health measures. These include contract tracing and quarantine of cases, or sometimes the quarantine of localities. Modelling suggests these measures may be effective. Health promotion programs should emphasise avoiding crowds, hand washing and hygiene and extensive testing of at risk persons. Vaccine development is a slow process and it will be a year(s) before it can become a component of public health interventions.
Schools of Public Health and Research Institute members of APACPH are actively involved in basic research, epidemiology of outbreaks and health promotion. This journal welcomes submissions that document the outbreak and contribute to the control of the disease.
1.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506.
2.Director General WHO. WHO Corona Virus briefing March 5 2020 https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—5-march-2020 (Accessed 6 Mar 2020). Geneva: WHO; 2020.
3.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/symptoms.html (Accessed 6 Mar 2020). Atlanta: CDC; 2020.
4.CCDC Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Emergency Response Epidemiology Team. The Epidemiological Characteristics of an Outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19) — China, 2020. China CDC Weekly. 2020;2(8):113-122.
5.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Disease of the week: Common cold https://www.cdc.gov/dotw/common-cold/ (Accessed 9 March 2020) Atlanta: CDC; 2020.
6.Binns C, Low WY. Remembering Gustav Klimt and 50 Million Others: The 100 Year Anniversary of the Greatest Human Epidemic. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2018;30(5):412-414.
7.Dorigatti I, Okell L, Cori A, et al, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis. Report 4: Severity of 2019-novel coronavirus (nCoV) https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-2019-nCoV-severity-10-02-2020.pdf (Accessed 6 Mar 2020). London: Imperial College;2020.
8.Richmond JK, Baglole DJ. Lassa fever: epidemiology, clinical features, and social consequences. BMJ. 2003;327(7426):1271-1275.
9.Rocklov J, Sjodin H, Wilder-Smith A. COVID-19 outbreak on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: estimating the epidemic potential and effectiveness of public health countermeasures. J Travel Med. 2020.
10.World Health Organisation. Cholera case fatality rate https://www.who.int/gho/epidemic_diseases/cholera/case_fatality_rate_text/en/ (Accessed 8 Mrach 2020). Geneva: WHO; 2016.
11.Swerdlow DL, Finelli L. Preparation for Possible Sustained Transmission of 2019 Novel Coronavirus: Lessons From Previous Epidemics. JAMA. 2020.
12.Mahase E. Coronavirus: covid-19 has killed more people than SARS and MERS combined, despite lower case fatality rate. Bmj-British Medical Journal. 2020;368.
13.Altman DG, Bland JM. STATISTICS NOTES – DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-1 – SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY .3. British Medical Journal. 1994;308(6943):1552-1552.
14.Hellewell J, Abbott S, Gimma A, et al. Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. Lancet Glob Health. 2020.
15.Australian Government Department of Health. Coronavirus (COVID-19) health alert https://www.health.gov.au/news/health-alerts/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-health-alert (Accessed 9 March 2020). Canberra Department of Health 2020.
16.World Health Organisation. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public (accessed 14 March 2020). Vol 90. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
17.Peiris JSM, Yuen KY, Osterhaus A, Stohr K. Current concepts: The severe acute respiratory syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;349(25):2431-2441.
18.Hui DSC, Zumla A. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Historical, Epidemiologic, and Clinical Features. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019;33(4):869-889.
19.Koul PA, Broor S, Saha S, et al. Differences in influenza seasonality by latitude, northern India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(10):1723-1726.
20.Manabe T, Yamaoka K, Tango T, et al. Chronological, geographical, and seasonal trends of human cases of avian influenza A (H5N1) in Vietnam, 2003-2014: a spatial analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:64.
21.Riedel S. Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005;18(1):21-25.
22.Binns C, Low WY. Infections and public health: who will win? Asia-Pacific journal of public health / Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health. 2014;26(1):4-6.
23.Mack TM, Khan MM, Thomas DB. EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SMALLPOX IN WEST-PAKISTAN .2. DETERMINANTS OF INTRAVILLAGE SPREAD OTHER THAN ACQUIRED IMMUNITY. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1972;95(2):169-&.
24.Hopkins DR. Smallpox: ten years gone. Am J Public Health. 1988;78(12):1589-1595.
25.Segall M. From cooperation to competition in national health systems–and back?: impact on professional ethics and quality of care. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2000;15(1):61-79.
26.Millar M, Hsu DTS. Can Healthcare Workers Reasonably Question the Duty to Care Whilst Healthcare Institutions Take a Reactive (Rather than Proactive) Approach to Infectious Disease Risks? Public Health Ethics. 2019;12(1):94-98.
27.Pawlikowski J, Banasiuk J, Sak J, Jojczuk M, Grzybowski A. Damien de Veuster (1840-1889): A life devoted to lepers. Clinics in Dermatology. 2018;36(5):680-685.
28.Sachs J. The Trump administration’s ludicrous approach to coronavirus vaccine (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/05/opinions/ludicrous-plan-coronavirus-vaccine-opinion-sachs/index.html) Accessed 8 March 2020). 2020.
29.Hatchett RJ, Mecher CE, Lipsitch M. Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(18):7582-7587.

Figure One. The clinical spectrum of COVID19 infection